Compensation plan design is not just about what you pay - it is about the system you build around pay decisions. Every plan we design is built on four non-negotiable principles that determine whether it will actually work in practice.
Pay should reinforce your organizational strategy - not just reflect what competitors pay. We begin every engagement by understanding what behaviors and outcomes your compensation plan needs to drive, then design the structure backward from those goals.
A compensation plan that employees cannot understand cannot influence their behavior. Complexity is not sophistication; it is a design failure. Every plan we deliver is tested against one question: Can the person it applies to calculate what they will earn before they act?
Every plan must be defensible to employees, regulators, and in litigation. We build in FLSA compliance review, pay equity analysis, and documentation standards that help ensure compensation decisions can withstand scrutiny from any direction.
Most compensation plans fail in year two because the organization does not know how to administer them consistently. We design the salary administration guidelines, decision authority framework, and annual review process into every engagement so the plan does not erode after we leave.
A well-designed salary structure organizes jobs into grades and ranges that reflect both market value and internal equity. We build structures with clear minimums, midpoints, and maximums for each grade, giving you a consistent framework for hiring offers, promotions, and merit increases - and a defensible basis for every pay decision.
Incentive plans are the mechanism through which your compensation strategy either reinforces or undermines organizational goals. A well-designed incentive plan encourages the behaviors you need; a poorly designed one rewards the wrong activity, creates unintended payout scenarios, and often demotivates the people it is meant to motivate. We design incentive plans holistically, integrating base salary, variable pay, and noncash recognition into a total compensation framework that is coherent, motivating, and financially predictable.
Executive incentive plans have fundamentally different requirements from staff plans - they must be tied to pre-established strategic performance objectives, aligned with board governance requirements, and designed with the governance documentation your compensation committee needs for IRS and regulatory compliance. We design executive incentive plans that motivate key leaders, deliver results for stakeholders, and hold up to the heightened scrutiny that executive compensation attracts.
Short-term incentive plans drive near-term performance and reward current-year results. Long-term incentive plans align executive and leadership behavior with the organization's multi-year strategic goals, build retention through deferred value, and signal to key employees that the organization is investing in their long-term future. We design both, and the relationship between them - so your total incentive framework drives the behaviors that matter at every time horizon.
Total compensation strategy encompasses every element of what you pay and provide to employees: base salary, variable pay, benefits, retirement, noncash recognition, and the intangible value of working for your organization. Most organizations have a total compensation story worth telling but no framework for communicating it. We design the strategy, build the philosophy statement, and create the total compensation valuation tools managers need for honest, effective compensation conversations with employees.
Salary administration guidelines are the documented procedures your HR team and managers need to make compensation decisions consistently, equitably, and in compliance with your compensation philosophy. Without them, every manager interprets the plan differently, and the internal inequities that result are both a cultural and a legal problem. We design salary administration guidelines typically in conjunction with a staff or executive compensation study, ensuring the plan you build is also a plan your organization can manage going forward.
JER HR Group integrates career growth into every compensation study and strategic compensation plan. Career pathing structures an employee's development path within the organization by defining the knowledge, skills, and experience required to progress from one level to the next and connecting that progression to a clear, transparent compensation framework.
When employees can see the path from where they are to where they want to go, and the specific competencies and compensation milestones along the way - engagement increases, voluntary turnover decreases, and your investment in compensation becomes a retention strategy instead of just a cost.
We build career pathing frameworks that are specific to your organization's structure, realistic given your budget, and communicated in a way your managers can actually use in development conversations.
Job architecture begins with clear job families, levels, progression criteria, and career paths. We connect this structure with compensation ranges and performance expectations, giving workforce planning a reliable framework for identifying critical roles, capability gaps, future talent needs, and the compensation implications of growth or change.
Documenting the specific knowledge, skills, and experience required at each level, so progression criteria are objective, transparent, and consistently applied across departments.
Connecting the career framework to the salary structure - so each level has a defined pay range and employees understand exactly how career progression translates to compensation opportunity.
Providing managers with the conversation guides, development plan templates, and career milestone documentation they need to have honest, productive career development conversations with their teams.
Compensation plan design without FLSA review creates legal exposure. Misclassification of exempt versus non-exempt employees is one of the most common and most expensive HR compliance mistakes - and it is almost always built into the compensation structure rather than addressed in it. We review FLSA classification as part of every compensation plan engagement, not as an add-on.
Assessment of every role in scope against the salary level, salary basis, and duties tests required for FLSA exemption - with documentation for each classification decision.
Review of current salary levels against the applicable federal and state salary thresholds for exempt classification, with identification of roles at risk of reclassification.
Documentation of the executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, or computer employee duties test basis for each exempt classification decision.
Where misclassification is identified, we develop a remediation plan - including reclassification procedures, back pay exposure quantification, and implementation sequencing.

From Content to Capability: Using AI to Create, Curate, Personalize, and Deploy Learning at Scale

The Missing Link Between People, Pay, and Performance: Why Job Architecture Matters More Than Ever

Positive Psychology for Teams
.png)
Compensation Begins Before Pay
.jpeg)
The Leader’s Coaching Mirror

The Missing Link Between People, Pay, and Performance: Why Job Architecture Matters More Than Ever

From Content to Capability: Using AI to Create, Curate, Personalize, and Deploy Learning at Scale

Positive Psychology for Teams

The Playbook for Turning Reviews into Action, Growth, and Accountability

The HR Horizon: What HR Needs to Know for 2027